GS Analyst: Daily Current Affairs

The Supreme Court's rejection of the demand for 100% verification of the paper trail left by votes cast through electronic voting machines (EVMs) has sparked debate over the integrity of the electoral process.

Upholding Integrity of Electoral Process

• The Supreme Court's rejection reaffirms its faith in the integrity of the electoral process, particularly with the introduction of the voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) system.
• Vote accuracy: Previous rulings by the Court have emphasized the indispensability of a paper trail for ensuring free and fair elections, highlighting the importance of addressing voter apprehensions regarding vote accuracy.
• No interference: Despite demands for increased verification, the Court has consistently declined to interfere with the existing system, citing administrative and technical safeguards that mitigate concerns of tampering.

Technological Advancements and Transparency

• Concerns: The introduction of the VVPAT system aimed to enhance transparency and address voter suspicions, but the extent of verification remains contentious, raising questions about the Election Commission of India's impartiality.
• Ensuring technological advancements in the verification process is crucial to bolstering public confidence in the electoral system and mitigating apprehensions of manipulation.
• Election Watchdog Impartiality: The increasing level of mistrust in the election watchdog underscores the need for transparent and accountable measures to address apprehensions of manipulation and ensure the integrity of elections.

Mains Question:

Discuss the need for balance between technological advancements in verification methods and the imperative of maintaining the impartiality of the Election Commission of India in ensuring free and fair elections.